The Wire The Review summarizes Big Data and privacy, recently released by the White House as follows :. Yes, NSA. But you need to worry about you private sector collecting your data, too.
One of the oldest arguments most frequently used by President Obama in the debate on government oversight was a variation of the following: you voluntarily put on much more information to Facebook and advertisers that the government collects on American citizens. And this is true, but, in the words of Edward Snowden, Facebook does not have the ability to "warheads on the forehead," meaning that the ramifications of Facebook data collection are somewhat different.
The new report, titled "Big Data: Seizing opportunities, preservation of values," trying to expand what the private sector could be ramifications. Pointedly, like The New York Times noted in its coverage. The report is the White House "in hopes of advancing the national debate on privacy beyond the National Security Agency surveillance activities to business practices such as Google and Facebook," as the paper puts it .
to this end, the report proposes six policy proposals, including a bill consumer rights, a law requiring companies report data breaches, and limits on data collected from students. It also suggests new protections against one of the most subtle threats inherent in massive data warehouses :. the ability to distinguish subtle
"the detailed personal profiles held on many consumers, combined with automated algorithm-driven decision making, could lead intentionally or unintentionally discriminatory results, or what some are already calling "digital redlining," the report said. The term "redlining" is a reference to the formerly common practice to delineate areas of cities where companies would apply different rules and costs - usually because of the racial composition of these neighborhoods. "Lead Civil Rights Federal Government and consumer protection agencies," the proposal continues, "should expand their technical expertise in order to identify practices and results facilitated by big data analyzes that have a discriminatory effect protected categories, and develop a plan to study and resolve violations of law "
to be very clear. the white House is not wrong. The extent of the data collection is unprecedented, and companies are already exploring ways to maximize the profits of the data analysis. Earlier this week, ThinkProgress published an article about a woman who hid her online business to hide her pregnancy from data collection systems. Atlantic Alexis Madrigal, "which last year noticed that his family is still pregnant unexpectedly had already attracted the attention of marketers, compared the use of . "Big Brother" story of "Big data" in the title of the most frequent use of the implications of data collection, in other words, are already vaguely understood - and not always appreciated
Source:. The Wire
0 Komentar