Online Privacy Decided by judges who do not use Email

2:33 PM
Online Privacy Decided by judges who do not use Email -
Keep Calm and Encrypt

future of online privacy Decided by the judges n ' use Email

Nearly half of the Supreme Court of the United States was born during the Great depression of the 1930s Four other justices are in their 60s, and the youngest is 54. most these judges had already lived half or more of their life when the Internet came into American life, putting them behind modern communications emails, texting and social media.

people who decide the fate of online privacy in the current legal cases and future have little or no personal point of reference when it comes to understanding how e-mail and other electronic communications have shaped the lives of Americans.

Justice Elena Kagan, "kid" of the court to 54, which uses the personal email and surfing the web, admitted that his colleagues "are not necessarily those most technologically sophisticated. "

When the judges want to communicate with another to the Supreme Court, they do not use email. Instead, the memos are paper reminiscent of parchment 19th wrote on hand-century and are delivered by room aid .

Some judges, including Chief Justice John Roberts, are clueless about the legitimate and legal reasons why the Americans would carry two cell phones.

In a recent case, Roberts "insinuated that the police could reasonably suspect that a person carries two cell phones to be a drug dealer. Is he not aware that much of the political class DC with which it associates - including many of its clergy - covers both personal and business phone every day, "columnist Trevor Timm wrote to the Guardian [

other members of the court have revealed their ignorance line referring to "Netflick" in a case of copyright online

"therefore, the future of our intimacy, our technology -.. these problems landed at the feet of a handful of tech-unsavvy judges future judicial candidates should be asked about their knowledge of technology during confirmation hearings and while many have made the argument. that the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] secret court should employ a technologist to explain the technical problems to the less technical judges, the same can be said of the Supreme Court. It's time to get the net already, "wrote Timm

Source :. AllGov

Previous
Next Post »
0 Komentar